以下文章来源于社会学理论大缸

大学到底要不要禁止使用ChatGPT？

该不该禁？

能不能禁？

怎么禁？

这些都是现在非常有争议，也悬而未决的话题。

重要提示：您需要做到以下几点：

-- 理解您正在使用的任何人工智能系统的限制；

-- 检查其生成内容的事实准确性；

-- 不要将由人工智能生成的内容作为主要来源依赖，应该将它与其他来源一起使用。

It is important that you:

-- Understand the limitations of any AI system you are using;

-- Check the factual accuracy of the content it generates;

-- Do not rely on AI generated content as a key source - use it in conjunction with other sources.

2.1 生成式人工智能工具是语言机器，而不是知识数据库——它们通过从大型数据集中“学习”的模式来预测下一个可能的单词或编程代码片段；

- Generative AI tools are language machines rather than databases of knowledge –they work by predicting the next plausible word or section of programming code from patterns that have been ‘learnt’ from large data sets;

2.2 AI工具没有理解它们所生成内容的能力。需要一个有知识的人来检查工作（通常是在迭代中进行）；

- AI tools have no understanding of what they generate. A knowledgeable human must check the work (often in iterations);

2.3 这些工具正在学习的数据集存在缺陷、偏见和限制；

- The data sets that such tools are learning from are flawed and contain inaccuracies, biases and limitations;

2.4 它们生成的文本并不总是事实正确的；

- They generate text that is not always factually correct;

2.5 它们可以创建具有安全漏洞、错误和使用非法库或调用 - 或侵犯版权的软件/代码；

- They can create software/code that has security flaws, bugs, and use illegal libraries or calls – or infringe copyrights;

2.6 通常情况下，AI生成的代码或计算看起来是合理的，但在更近距离的细节工作中存在错误。在此方式产生的任何代码或计算中，应该由熟练掌握该编程语言的人员进行全面检查；

- Often the code or calculation produced by AI will look plausible but contain errors in detailed working on closer inspection. A human trained in that programming language should fully check any code or calculation produced in this way;

2.7 它们的模型训练数据不是最新的 - 目前它们在某个时间点（例如ChatGPT的情况下为2021年）之后的世界和事件上拥有有限或受限制的数据；

- The data their models are trained on is not up-to-date – they currently have limited or constrained data on the world and events after a certain point (2021 in the case of ChatGPT);

2.8 它们可以生成冒犯性内容；

- They can generate offensive content;

2.9 它们会产生虚假的引文和参考资料；

- They produce fake citations and references;

2.10 这样的系统是无道德的——它们不知道生成冒犯性、不准确或误导性内容是错误的；

Such systems are amoral - they don’t know that it is wrong to generate offensive,inaccurate or misleading content;

2.11 它们包括隐藏的剽窃 - 意味着它们利用了来自人类作者的单词和想法，但没有引用它们，我们认为这是剽窃的行为；

- They include hidden plagiarism – meaning that they make use of words and ideas from human authors without referencing them, which we would consider as plagiarism;

2.12 存在侵犯图片和其他受版权保护的材料的风险。

- There are risks of copyright infringements on pictures and other copyrighted material.

重要提示：过度依赖人工智能工具来生成书面内容、软件代码或分析结果会减少您练习和发展重要技能（例如写作、批判性思维、评估、分析或编程技能）的机会。这些都是重要的技能，在大学和毕业后成功所必需的。

Important note: Overreliance on AI tools simply to generate written content, software code or analysis reduces your opportunity to practice and develop key skills (e.g. writing, critical thinking,evaluation, analysis or coding skills). These are all important skills that are valued and required to succeed in and beyond your time at University.

三、引用和承认使用人工智能

Citing and acknowledging the use of AI

在允许在评估工作中使用人工智能的情况下，重要的是要对这些工具和从中生成的内容进行透明的引用和承认。

Where the use of AI is permitted in assessed work, it is important to be transparent about the use of such tools and content generated from them.

由人工智能生成的内容是不可恢复的 - 它无法像其他数字来源那样检索或链接。因此，目前的惯例是将由人工智能生成的内容引用为“个人通讯”（因为它基于提出问题或给出提示并接收答案）。这通常是一种仅在文本内的引用方式。

Content generated from AI is non-recoverable - it can not be retrieved or linked to in the same way that other digital sources can. For this reason, current convention is to cite AI generated content as “personal communication” (because it is based on asking a question or giving a prompt and receiving an answer). This is usually an in-text only citation.

每种参考文献风格（例如哈佛风格、APA风格）都会说明如何实现这一点，因此您应该查阅您正在使用的参考文献风格的指南。

Each reference style (e.g. Harvard, APA) will set out how to do this, so you should consult the guidance for the reference style you are using.

此外，如果您使用任何生成式人工智能工具（如ChatGPT）来帮助您（例如生成思路或制定计划），即使您在作业中没有包含任何由AI生成的内容，您仍应该说明您如何使用该工具。您应该承认使用的AI工具，描述您如何使用它，并指出您访问它的日期。

Additionally, if you use any generative AI tool (such as ChatGPT) to help you (e.g. generate ideas or develop a plan), you should still acknowledge how you have used the tool, even if you do not include any AI generated content in your work. You should acknowledge the AI tool used, describe how you used it, and indicate the date you accessed it.

如果你看完了整个指南，那不妨再来看下GPT自己是怎么理解这份针对它的文件。我问了三个问题：

-END-